
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Krauthammer’s Ridiculous Essay on American Hegemony</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cmcforum.com/opinion/10192009-krauthammer%e2%80%99s-ridiculous-essay-on-american-hegemony/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cmcforum.com/opinion/10192009-krauthammer%e2%80%99s-ridiculous-essay-on-american-hegemony</link>
	<description>The Official Student Publication of Claremont McKenna College</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 03:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: infantryman</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/opinion/10192009-krauthammer%e2%80%99s-ridiculous-essay-on-american-hegemony#comment-17237</link>
		<dc:creator>infantryman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=7116#comment-17237</guid>
		<description>Your article shows very little understanding of the historiographical background of Krauthammer&#039;s article (the first of two on the subject of America in Decline) in relation to the missile defense shield. 

The missile shield intended for Eastern Europe was specifically for defeating missiles from both south and east of Russia, no one expects a &quot;sleeping bear&quot; scenario where the Russians come back and launch their &quot;5,000 nukes&quot;. It&#039;s China and Iran, and if you think we shouldn&#039;t be preparing now for future (50-100 year) precautions related to those two countries you are naive.

Our entire relationship TO Russia has been a colossal disaster so far this administration, and has shown countries like Poland that any intention we had of extending a welcome (really more desired) presence inside their former Motherland&#039;s backyard is not to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article shows very little understanding of the historiographical background of Krauthammer&#8217;s article (the first of two on the subject of America in Decline) in relation to the missile defense shield. </p>
<p>The missile shield intended for Eastern Europe was specifically for defeating missiles from both south and east of Russia, no one expects a &#8220;sleeping bear&#8221; scenario where the Russians come back and launch their &#8220;5,000 nukes&#8221;. It&#8217;s China and Iran, and if you think we shouldn&#8217;t be preparing now for future (50-100 year) precautions related to those two countries you are naive.</p>
<p>Our entire relationship TO Russia has been a colossal disaster so far this administration, and has shown countries like Poland that any intention we had of extending a welcome (really more desired) presence inside their former Motherland&#8217;s backyard is not to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infantryman</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/opinion/10192009-krauthammer%e2%80%99s-ridiculous-essay-on-american-hegemony#comment-48934</link>
		<dc:creator>infantryman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=7116#comment-48934</guid>
		<description>Your article shows very little understanding of the historiographical background of Krauthammer&#039;s article (the first of two on the subject of America in Decline) in relation to the missile defense shield. 

The missile shield intended for Eastern Europe was specifically for defeating missiles from both south and east of Russia, no one expects a &quot;sleeping bear&quot; scenario where the Russians come back and launch their &quot;5,000 nukes&quot;. It&#039;s China and Iran, and if you think we shouldn&#039;t be preparing now for future (50-100 year) precautions related to those two countries you are naive.

Our entire relationship TO Russia has been a colossal disaster so far this administration, and has shown countries like Poland that any intention we had of extending a welcome (really more desired) presence inside their former Motherland&#039;s backyard is not to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article shows very little understanding of the historiographical background of Krauthammer&#8217;s article (the first of two on the subject of America in Decline) in relation to the missile defense shield. </p>
<p>The missile shield intended for Eastern Europe was specifically for defeating missiles from both south and east of Russia, no one expects a &#8220;sleeping bear&#8221; scenario where the Russians come back and launch their &#8220;5,000 nukes&#8221;. It&#8217;s China and Iran, and if you think we shouldn&#8217;t be preparing now for future (50-100 year) precautions related to those two countries you are naive.</p>
<p>Our entire relationship TO Russia has been a colossal disaster so far this administration, and has shown countries like Poland that any intention we had of extending a welcome (really more desired) presence inside their former Motherland&#8217;s backyard is not to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles C. Johnson</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/opinion/10192009-krauthammer%e2%80%99s-ridiculous-essay-on-american-hegemony#comment-17161</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles C. Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 02:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=7116#comment-17161</guid>
		<description>Ilan, 

Great points. I wonder why Obama also refuses to finish the negotiations for the free trade agreements with friendly countries like S. Korea and Colombia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ilan, </p>
<p>Great points. I wonder why Obama also refuses to finish the negotiations for the free trade agreements with friendly countries like S. Korea and Colombia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles C. Johnson</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/opinion/10192009-krauthammer%e2%80%99s-ridiculous-essay-on-american-hegemony#comment-48933</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles C. Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 02:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=7116#comment-48933</guid>
		<description>Ilan, 

Great points. I wonder why Obama also refuses to finish the negotiations for the free trade agreements with friendly countries like S. Korea and Colombia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ilan, </p>
<p>Great points. I wonder why Obama also refuses to finish the negotiations for the free trade agreements with friendly countries like S. Korea and Colombia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles C. Johnson</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/opinion/10192009-krauthammer%e2%80%99s-ridiculous-essay-on-american-hegemony#comment-17160</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles C. Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 02:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=7116#comment-17160</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the spanking. 

http://www.claremontconservative.com/2009/10/spragues-mistaken-piece-attacking.html

Ilan got him with the wooden spoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the spanking. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.claremontconservative.com/2009/10/spragues-mistaken-piece-attacking.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.claremontconservative.com/2009/10/spragues-mistaken-piece-attacking.html</a></p>
<p>Ilan got him with the wooden spoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles C. Johnson</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/opinion/10192009-krauthammer%e2%80%99s-ridiculous-essay-on-american-hegemony#comment-48932</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles C. Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 02:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=7116#comment-48932</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the spanking. 

http://www.claremontconservative.com/2009/10/spragues-mistaken-piece-attacking.html

Ilan got him with the wooden spoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the spanking. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.claremontconservative.com/2009/10/spragues-mistaken-piece-attacking.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.claremontconservative.com/2009/10/spragues-mistaken-piece-attacking.html</a></p>
<p>Ilan got him with the wooden spoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul O'Pinion</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/opinion/10192009-krauthammer%e2%80%99s-ridiculous-essay-on-american-hegemony#comment-17113</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul O'Pinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=7116#comment-17113</guid>
		<description>Excellent comment by Ilan.  If Hugo Chavez and Raul Castro are unhappy about the perfectly legal turn of events in Honduras (Zelaya was trying to change the Constitution and become Dictator-for-life), it must be a good thing.  With all due apologies to all of you Che-lovers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent comment by Ilan.  If Hugo Chavez and Raul Castro are unhappy about the perfectly legal turn of events in Honduras (Zelaya was trying to change the Constitution and become Dictator-for-life), it must be a good thing.  With all due apologies to all of you Che-lovers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul O'Pinion</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/opinion/10192009-krauthammer%e2%80%99s-ridiculous-essay-on-american-hegemony#comment-48931</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul O'Pinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=7116#comment-48931</guid>
		<description>Excellent comment by Ilan.  If Hugo Chavez and Raul Castro are unhappy about the perfectly legal turn of events in Honduras (Zelaya was trying to change the Constitution and become Dictator-for-life), it must be a good thing.  With all due apologies to all of you Che-lovers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent comment by Ilan.  If Hugo Chavez and Raul Castro are unhappy about the perfectly legal turn of events in Honduras (Zelaya was trying to change the Constitution and become Dictator-for-life), it must be a good thing.  With all due apologies to all of you Che-lovers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilan Wurman</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/opinion/10192009-krauthammer%e2%80%99s-ridiculous-essay-on-american-hegemony#comment-17084</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilan Wurman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=7116#comment-17084</guid>
		<description>Charlie,

You really miss the point on Honduras. Just because other countries think one thing, does that make them right? Especially if the UN believes something, it&#039;s almost guaranteed to be a bad thing in this day and age.

The fact is, our own Library of Congress has examined the Honduran constitution and declared that Zelaya&#039;s removal from power was perfectly legal, though his exile was not. Senator Jim DeMint has detailed in the Wall Street Journal what he say in Honduras, and he writes that almost everyone in Honduras supported ousting Zelaya.

What is more, there is already an election scheduled for November 29, and neither Zelaya nor his current replacement are contenders. Thus, you can almost guarantee that there is no corrupt power grab going on. Honduras is still a democracy.

But let me ask you a deeper question, that goes right to Obama&#039;s approach to foreign affairs. Even IF the coup was illegal (which it wasn&#039;t) and Honduras is not a democracy (though it is), why does he insist on negotiating with dictators in Iran and North Korea, but not with a &quot;dictator&quot; in Honduras? Why does he appease tyrants, but apply pressure to friendly governments (India, Poland, Honduras, Israel)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie,</p>
<p>You really miss the point on Honduras. Just because other countries think one thing, does that make them right? Especially if the UN believes something, it&#8217;s almost guaranteed to be a bad thing in this day and age.</p>
<p>The fact is, our own Library of Congress has examined the Honduran constitution and declared that Zelaya&#8217;s removal from power was perfectly legal, though his exile was not. Senator Jim DeMint has detailed in the Wall Street Journal what he say in Honduras, and he writes that almost everyone in Honduras supported ousting Zelaya.</p>
<p>What is more, there is already an election scheduled for November 29, and neither Zelaya nor his current replacement are contenders. Thus, you can almost guarantee that there is no corrupt power grab going on. Honduras is still a democracy.</p>
<p>But let me ask you a deeper question, that goes right to Obama&#8217;s approach to foreign affairs. Even IF the coup was illegal (which it wasn&#8217;t) and Honduras is not a democracy (though it is), why does he insist on negotiating with dictators in Iran and North Korea, but not with a &#8220;dictator&#8221; in Honduras? Why does he appease tyrants, but apply pressure to friendly governments (India, Poland, Honduras, Israel)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilan Wurman</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/opinion/10192009-krauthammer%e2%80%99s-ridiculous-essay-on-american-hegemony#comment-48930</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilan Wurman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=7116#comment-48930</guid>
		<description>Charlie,

You really miss the point on Honduras. Just because other countries think one thing, does that make them right? Especially if the UN believes something, it&#039;s almost guaranteed to be a bad thing in this day and age.

The fact is, our own Library of Congress has examined the Honduran constitution and declared that Zelaya&#039;s removal from power was perfectly legal, though his exile was not. Senator Jim DeMint has detailed in the Wall Street Journal what he say in Honduras, and he writes that almost everyone in Honduras supported ousting Zelaya.

What is more, there is already an election scheduled for November 29, and neither Zelaya nor his current replacement are contenders. Thus, you can almost guarantee that there is no corrupt power grab going on. Honduras is still a democracy.

But let me ask you a deeper question, that goes right to Obama&#039;s approach to foreign affairs. Even IF the coup was illegal (which it wasn&#039;t) and Honduras is not a democracy (though it is), why does he insist on negotiating with dictators in Iran and North Korea, but not with a &quot;dictator&quot; in Honduras? Why does he appease tyrants, but apply pressure to friendly governments (India, Poland, Honduras, Israel)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie,</p>
<p>You really miss the point on Honduras. Just because other countries think one thing, does that make them right? Especially if the UN believes something, it&#8217;s almost guaranteed to be a bad thing in this day and age.</p>
<p>The fact is, our own Library of Congress has examined the Honduran constitution and declared that Zelaya&#8217;s removal from power was perfectly legal, though his exile was not. Senator Jim DeMint has detailed in the Wall Street Journal what he say in Honduras, and he writes that almost everyone in Honduras supported ousting Zelaya.</p>
<p>What is more, there is already an election scheduled for November 29, and neither Zelaya nor his current replacement are contenders. Thus, you can almost guarantee that there is no corrupt power grab going on. Honduras is still a democracy.</p>
<p>But let me ask you a deeper question, that goes right to Obama&#8217;s approach to foreign affairs. Even IF the coup was illegal (which it wasn&#8217;t) and Honduras is not a democracy (though it is), why does he insist on negotiating with dictators in Iran and North Korea, but not with a &#8220;dictator&#8221; in Honduras? Why does he appease tyrants, but apply pressure to friendly governments (India, Poland, Honduras, Israel)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

