
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attention: Class of 2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cmcforum.com/news/5cene/08052009-attention-class-of-2013/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cmcforum.com/life/08052009-attention-class-of-2013</link>
	<description>The Official Student Publication of Claremont McKenna College</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 03:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agreed</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/life/08052009-attention-class-of-2013#comment-14359</link>
		<dc:creator>Agreed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=5469#comment-14359</guid>
		<description>Yeah, RCP has been moving decidedly rightward since the rise of Obama.  I balance it by reading fivethirtyeight.com.  It was founded by a baseball statistician, and focuses on polls and stats, and it&#039;s got a leftward tilt, but not a crazy one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, RCP has been moving decidedly rightward since the rise of Obama.  I balance it by reading fivethirtyeight.com.  It was founded by a baseball statistician, and focuses on polls and stats, and it&#8217;s got a leftward tilt, but not a crazy one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agreed</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/life/08052009-attention-class-of-2013#comment-48353</link>
		<dc:creator>Agreed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=5469#comment-48353</guid>
		<description>Yeah, RCP has been moving decidedly rightward since the rise of Obama.  I balance it by reading fivethirtyeight.com.  It was founded by a baseball statistician, and focuses on polls and stats, and it&#039;s got a leftward tilt, but not a crazy one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, RCP has been moving decidedly rightward since the rise of Obama.  I balance it by reading fivethirtyeight.com.  It was founded by a baseball statistician, and focuses on polls and stats, and it&#8217;s got a leftward tilt, but not a crazy one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woo...</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/life/08052009-attention-class-of-2013#comment-14355</link>
		<dc:creator>woo...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=5469#comment-14355</guid>
		<description>Per suggestion, Ive been reading real clear politics daily.  I couldn&#039;t help but notice a clear lack of liberal articles.  I by no means consider myself a democrat, but many arguments made by various republican writers seemed to intentionally misconstrue presidential statements and poll responses to forward their obvious right wing discrepancies.  I think I&#039;ll stick to the economist.  At least with them, my ignorance of english politics gives the impression of non-biased reporting.  Are there any other political or news websites that you would suggest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Per suggestion, Ive been reading real clear politics daily.  I couldn&#8217;t help but notice a clear lack of liberal articles.  I by no means consider myself a democrat, but many arguments made by various republican writers seemed to intentionally misconstrue presidential statements and poll responses to forward their obvious right wing discrepancies.  I think I&#8217;ll stick to the economist.  At least with them, my ignorance of english politics gives the impression of non-biased reporting.  Are there any other political or news websites that you would suggest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woo...</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/life/08052009-attention-class-of-2013#comment-48352</link>
		<dc:creator>woo...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=5469#comment-48352</guid>
		<description>Per suggestion, Ive been reading real clear politics daily.  I couldn&#039;t help but notice a clear lack of liberal articles.  I by no means consider myself a democrat, but many arguments made by various republican writers seemed to intentionally misconstrue presidential statements and poll responses to forward their obvious right wing discrepancies.  I think I&#039;ll stick to the economist.  At least with them, my ignorance of english politics gives the impression of non-biased reporting.  Are there any other political or news websites that you would suggest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Per suggestion, Ive been reading real clear politics daily.  I couldn&#8217;t help but notice a clear lack of liberal articles.  I by no means consider myself a democrat, but many arguments made by various republican writers seemed to intentionally misconstrue presidential statements and poll responses to forward their obvious right wing discrepancies.  I think I&#8217;ll stick to the economist.  At least with them, my ignorance of english politics gives the impression of non-biased reporting.  Are there any other political or news websites that you would suggest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/life/08052009-attention-class-of-2013#comment-14145</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=5469#comment-14145</guid>
		<description>One other thing you need to know: 98% of CMC Forum articles will turn into debates with/about/in spite of Charles Johnson.

Politico.com...use it

Piece of advice number one is the truest story ever told. 

Last until at least 6:30 on 6:01. And don&#039;t throw up in or around the general door vicinity of Green 107. If you can avoid it. Really. Please don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other thing you need to know: 98% of CMC Forum articles will turn into debates with/about/in spite of Charles Johnson.</p>
<p>Politico.com&#8230;use it</p>
<p>Piece of advice number one is the truest story ever told. </p>
<p>Last until at least 6:30 on 6:01. And don&#8217;t throw up in or around the general door vicinity of Green 107. If you can avoid it. Really. Please don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/life/08052009-attention-class-of-2013#comment-48351</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=5469#comment-48351</guid>
		<description>One other thing you need to know: 98% of CMC Forum articles will turn into debates with/about/in spite of Charles Johnson.

Politico.com...use it

Piece of advice number one is the truest story ever told. 

Last until at least 6:30 on 6:01. And don&#039;t throw up in or around the general door vicinity of Green 107. If you can avoid it. Really. Please don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other thing you need to know: 98% of CMC Forum articles will turn into debates with/about/in spite of Charles Johnson.</p>
<p>Politico.com&#8230;use it</p>
<p>Piece of advice number one is the truest story ever told. </p>
<p>Last until at least 6:30 on 6:01. And don&#8217;t throw up in or around the general door vicinity of Green 107. If you can avoid it. Really. Please don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/life/08052009-attention-class-of-2013#comment-14144</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=5469#comment-14144</guid>
		<description>Haha yeah thanks for the photo Emily. some shoddy form though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha yeah thanks for the photo Emily. some shoddy form though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/life/08052009-attention-class-of-2013#comment-48350</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=5469#comment-48350</guid>
		<description>Haha yeah thanks for the photo Emily. some shoddy form though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha yeah thanks for the photo Emily. some shoddy form though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles C. Johnson</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/life/08052009-attention-class-of-2013#comment-14078</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles C. Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=5469#comment-14078</guid>
		<description>How am I fair game? By having my own opinions? And what bridges did I burn? 

I think it&#039;s more likely that people can&#039;t respond to my arguments so they make things personal. Often people who are intolerant of heterodox ideas feel the need to go after people personally. I know that it&#039;s often a good tactic to demonize someone with whom you disagree politically -- Saul Alinksy would be proud -- but it&#039;s a lazy way out.

I understand the efforts to go after me personally, but really, you should let the freshmen make up their own opinions about CMC and those who attend it -- if only so they can make their own prejudices. It&#039;s a courtesy you were extended, after all, why not extend it to others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How am I fair game? By having my own opinions? And what bridges did I burn? </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s more likely that people can&#8217;t respond to my arguments so they make things personal. Often people who are intolerant of heterodox ideas feel the need to go after people personally. I know that it&#8217;s often a good tactic to demonize someone with whom you disagree politically &#8212; Saul Alinksy would be proud &#8212; but it&#8217;s a lazy way out.</p>
<p>I understand the efforts to go after me personally, but really, you should let the freshmen make up their own opinions about CMC and those who attend it &#8212; if only so they can make their own prejudices. It&#8217;s a courtesy you were extended, after all, why not extend it to others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles C. Johnson</title>
		<link>http://cmcforum.com/life/08052009-attention-class-of-2013#comment-48349</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles C. Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmcforum.com/?p=5469#comment-48349</guid>
		<description>How am I fair game? By having my own opinions? And what bridges did I burn? 

I think it&#039;s more likely that people can&#039;t respond to my arguments so they make things personal. Often people who are intolerant of heterodox ideas feel the need to go after people personally. I know that it&#039;s often a good tactic to demonize someone with whom you disagree politically -- Saul Alinksy would be proud -- but it&#039;s a lazy way out.

I understand the efforts to go after me personally, but really, you should let the freshmen make up their own opinions about CMC and those who attend it -- if only so they can make their own prejudices. It&#039;s a courtesy you were extended, after all, why not extend it to others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How am I fair game? By having my own opinions? And what bridges did I burn? </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s more likely that people can&#8217;t respond to my arguments so they make things personal. Often people who are intolerant of heterodox ideas feel the need to go after people personally. I know that it&#8217;s often a good tactic to demonize someone with whom you disagree politically &#8212; Saul Alinksy would be proud &#8212; but it&#8217;s a lazy way out.</p>
<p>I understand the efforts to go after me personally, but really, you should let the freshmen make up their own opinions about CMC and those who attend it &#8212; if only so they can make their own prejudices. It&#8217;s a courtesy you were extended, after all, why not extend it to others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

