Welcome to Manuary

 

Editor’s Note*: the Forum is an equal-opportunity organization and believes that women should take pleasure in all twelve months of the year.
*This note was added by a female editor.

Men, we have arrived. The detestable epoch of familial drivel and good natured warmth towards all of humanity has finally ended. With a boom and echo of the real projectiles that brought us glory and honor in the past, New Year’s fireworks are the harbinger of deliverance from the holiday season. No longer shall we remain in thrall to the threateningly wielded rolling-pins of matriarchs who force us to help in the production of Yuletide sugary confection. The sticky-sweet grenadine buzzing of Mariah Carey’s “All I Want for Christmas” has now been drowned out in the feral roar of barbarian debauchery that was New Year’s Eve. Now is our time! Now, is the hallowed month of MANUARY!

We are prepared, having adhered to the sacred commandment of Decembeard (and for the less hirsute of us, also to the noble dedications of No-shave November) to break the manacles of domestic frivolity in which the holidays bind us. Let us charge, as a single brawny phalanx, into the coming year. Manuary has long been the time for great deeds such as this. Never shall we forget the glorious march of the Alamanni in Manuary of 366 across the frozen Rhine, enduring wicked frost-bite and yet still bringing many sandal-wearing Romans to their pudgy knees. Nor will we lapse in honoring the exploits of Manuary 1777, when George Washington defeated General Cornwallis at the Battle of Princeton in the boldest strike against tea-drinking sissydom ever struck up until the end of the Raj. The list of Mantastic occurrences goes on and on: the British took the Falklands in Manuary of 1822, Al Capone was born, as was General Douglas “Nuke China” MacArthur. In what month do you think the rugged, flannel-clad state of Alaska joined the Union? It sure as hell wasn’t April.

I remind you, men, of our noble heritage for good reason. The plebian masses limp into January as if it were the dread Monday of an entire year, blinking off their hangovers in the light of a new month and clutching their resolutions like cardboard shields against the tide of reality. Such is not our way. Men (and any women who wish to join us knowing that no allowances will be made in the costume requirements), enormous spiky clubs in hand, shall bludgeon this year into a malleable chunk to be shaped by our iron will. A foolish poet once wrote, roughly, “let us rush out and seize the day.” To this I reply, “let us saunter out in a relaxed but intimidating fashion and seize ALL of the remaining 365.” And when Manuary is over we may shave, but only because the beards inhibit the consumption of the libations that come with the onset of FeBrewuary.

 
 
 

12 Comments

 
  1. Eminem
    2010-01-05
    09:24:08

    I'm going to read this again and try to find the part that's supposed to make me laugh

     
    • Will
      2010-01-05
      11:11:36

      The category isn't make some ignorant little moron laugh, it's humor. Humor doesn't imply that you, in particular, should laugh. I'm sorry there weren''t any poo-poo and pee-pee jokes to give you half chub. The point here is general amusement, and I believe the goal is well accomplished. In no way is degradation of women the main outcome of this either miss jasper. You can't be humorous anymore thanks to the high level of PC censorship.

      It's a decent article, well intended I'm sure though the vocab is slightly much. I guess it adds to the intended epic effect Nathan was looking for.

       
    • Jraft
      2010-01-09
      01:01:07

      yeah, lighten up.

       
  2. Amy Jasper
    2010-01-05
    10:14:55

    It's the parts where the historic subjugation and marginalization of women are celebrated and modernized. Thanks, *female editor, for signing off on this crap.

     
  3. Patrick Atwater
    2010-01-05
    12:04:19

    You know Amy maybe--just maybe--gender is not zero sum game, and we can edify one archetype without diminishing the other. Or maybe we should wallow in culture of victimization and a language of oppression. I feel that'll get the ball moving forward.

     
  4. bigchris1313
    2010-01-05
    15:06:02

    I'm sorry--what is the reader supposed to take away from this maelstrom of sesquipedalian verbosity?

    I worship at the cult of alpha as much as the next bro, but perhaps the author could have taken a page from the Bard* and simply written, "Men of Claremont: don't be a bitch."

    Of course, without the lexiconic window dressing, this imperative connotes a degree of misogyny--but at least the reader could glean something from the article aside from a few words to be sprinkled casually into cocktail conversation.

    *See: Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, The Tragedy of: II, ii

     
    • case closed
      2010-01-09
      17:04:55

      ^^what he said

      Big Chris, all of your comments always rock. your description of what a man should wear for monte carlo was epic. can you please write a guess column?

       
  5. The Joker
    2010-01-05
    21:15:23

    Why so serious?

     
  6. leonidas
    2010-01-05
    22:35:55

    This Is Not Sparta!

     
  7. PT
    2010-01-08
    01:17:02

    Femruary shall soon follow with the might of a thousand yogalattes instructors.

    Nathan will be spared from the estrogenocide - only to amuse us with his, like, totally adorable button nose.

     
  8. Jillian
    2010-01-09
    01:02:16

    Nate, I thought your writing was really funny. Thanks for the optimism among the January Blahs!

     
  9. Jillian
    2010-01-09
    01:02:35

    Also, the historical anecdotes really added to your post.

     

Recent