“The Analyst Papers,” named in honor of CMC’s first student newspaper, the Analyst, is a five-part series published by the Forum, the official student publication of Claremont McKenna College.

For the first time, the history of Claremont McKenna has been brought online. The Analyst Papers has been published in the form of five accessible articles, with the aim of navigating through years of characters, monuments, and obstacles. CMC’s history is a short one, but a good one, and few know much of it. To learn it is to better understand what CMC stands for, its challenges and its future.

In 1996, the Trustees of CMC commissioned California historian Kevin Starr to write a book commemorating the College’s first fifty years. His remarkable work, “Commerce and Civilization: Claremont McKenna College, 1946-1996”, has been a key source for this series.

Additionally, CMC’s Development Office has opened the College’s archives to Forum staff for this project. We thank them, as well as the CMC Alumni Association, for access to primary sources and first-hand interviews.

Part I: The Founding: An Idea, Long Before a College

Part II: CMC’s Conservative Heart

Part III: The Challenge of the Campus

Part IV: Claremont Men’s College, with Women

Highlights in Part V:

· As the demand for higher education has increased, publishers such as U.S. News have brought unprecedented attention to liberal arts colleges.

· CMC finds itself challenged to remain liberal arts in character while proving itself an outstanding alternative.

· The College’s fourth president, Pamela Gann, discusses CMC’s founding mission going forward.


Part V

Our Place in the Liberal Arts

Politics may have motivated the College’s founding, and economics may have fueled its rise. But from the very start, Claremont McKenna was devoted to the liberal arts. And in America, over the past thirty years, liberal arts colleges have changed.

As a collective group, institutions of this model have risen to a new level of national exposure. Concurrently, the demand for quality education around the world has increased. The result has been unprecedented success. These small, expensive American colleges have become more selective than ever.

But for some, the effects of this exposure go way beyond admissions statistics. As Claremont McKenna continues to gain recognition, the College has been challenged to assert itself as an institution wholly separate from its equals, while still equal nonetheless.

And so, possibly more than any other point in its history, these national trends have tested Claremont McKenna’s mission and identity—one that was already unique among its peers from the start.

· The Liberal Arts Reaffirmed ·

Claremont's campus, seen from the air.

“When we were founded, we were very focused on free enterprise in the private sector, and democracy in the public sector,” Claremont McKenna President Pamela Gann said in a Forum panel discussion with the presidents of the five Claremont Colleges in February 2011.

“How you implement that mission is not static,” she said.

In CMC’s early years, students worked in trailers and lived in basements. Political economy was the dominant theme of the curriculum. The College was devoted to a handful of men.

Since then, CMC has grown to over a thousand students, and has recognized the complexities of breeding leadership in the public and private sectors by growing other departments such as literature, history, and psychology.

The mission of the school has been implemented differently, but with the same vigor, since women were first accepted to the school, in a move that respected the adaptability of the College’s founding vision.

“All the colleges subsequently founded, all of the undergraduate colleges, would be broadly liberal arts in character,” Robert Bernard said in an interview, stored in CMC’s archives. “But we didn’t feel that this would prevent them from emphasizing some special field of learning.”

Alumni meet on Green Beach for CMC's 30th reunion.

Bernard agreed with his colleagues that an essential liberal arts “character” was not exclusive with an adjoining institutional focus. And in a Memorandum on Proposed College for Men at Claremont, edited by Russell Story and published in May 1941, that institutional focus was made clear.

“These men need common perspectives, historical and philosophical,” the document reads. “If it would be unique in its program and its achievements, it must have a breadth of view adequate to encompass the complex economic, social, and political relationships that exist in the functioning of modern government, and in both domestic and world economies.”

The document even calls for students to take up “apprenticeships” during their studies.

Today, it may seem like Claremont’s unique approach contradicts fundamental values of the liberal arts: that no field is taken with more weight than another, that learning should be done for the sake of learning. But Claremont McKenna insists that learning should be done for the sake of doing. It has been the College’s operating principle since it’s founding.

That modus operandi is why the College has succeeded with such haste. CMC started providing a service that simply wasn’t offered before.

· CMC and the Rankings Game ·

But like it or not, Claremont McKenna’s success is not evaluated in light of its history.

High school students in Iowa, curious parents in Thailand, and employers in New York haven’t a clue of the College’s age, much less the age of its elusive name, which is only half that of the school’s existence.

Instead of knowing CMC through its history or its alumni—most of whom are alive today, and who couldn’t collectively fill a football stadium—they likely know about Claremont McKenna because college evaluation today has been standardized through college rankings.

Green Beach in 2011.

Luckily for CMC, where there are college rankings, CMC is often present. That national exposure has been as beneficial as it has been challenging.

U.S. News & World Report, the nation’s premiere college ranking source, has generally benefited the College, as well as its peers. Simply put: by placing Pomona, Claremont McKenna and Harvey Mudd on a ranking given equivalence to a university list featuring Harvard, Stanford, and Columbia, the smaller, lesser-known liberal arts colleges gain a prominence they could not gain alone with comparatively smaller alumni pools, endowments, and sports teams.

“As a young College, U.S. News has probably helped CMC become better known, as have other, more recent rankings, including last year, the annual Princeton ReviewPayScale, and others,” President Gann told the Forum.

McKenna Auditorium does not survive CMC's master plan, which lays the foundations for a larger student body.

One of the biggest problems with U.S. News was well summarized by “Tipping Point” author Malcolm Gladwell, who wrote an article in the New Yorker in February 2011 on the topic. In its attempt to be both comprehensive and heterogeneous, he wrote, U.S. News achieves neither.

Among the top twenty liberal arts colleges in America today, according to U.S. News, are Swarthmore College, a broadly liberal arts institution on the East Coast; Claremont McKenna College, an institution without an arts department or its own science department, but with an economics department with an endowment the size of most other colleges in full; Harvey Mudd College, an engineering school; and West Point Academy, which awards a single degree to its graduates.

So it would appear that Claremont McKenna is not alone in its fight to the top of a ranking unsympathetic to its focus. But whether CMC should shift that focus, that founding mission, is a question that has crept onto campus.

Additionally, with the advent of national college marketing efforts, college rankings with less comprehensive goals have gained in popularity. The Princeton Review, The Daily Beast and College Prowler rank colleges in different categories. Among them, CMC has been featured as the happiest college in America, the best fed, the best housed (a far cry from Coconut Grove), and the largest consumer of beer.

Whether the College lets these outside influences change life on campus is up to the College. But for the first time in its history, that has become a real possibility. Being CMC has gained the school a national reputation; whether a national reputation can change CMC remains to be seen.

· Going Forward, Respecting the Past ·

At a Forum meeting with the Presidents of the Claremont Colleges, Gann reiterates CMC's devotion to democracy and free enterprise, while stating that our mission is "not static."

Claremont McKenna’s fourth president, Pamela Brooks Gann, believes the unique purpose of the curriculum has been the most important factor in its success.

“Our focus on leadership has not changed,” Gann told the Forum, “and we are putting more resources into this aspect of our mission.”

Gann’s statements would imply that, despite the murmurs on campus, Claremont’s focus on business, the professions, and public affairs—“leadership in the liberal arts,” in a catchphrase—will remain at the heart of the College.

Second and third to our mission, Gann attributes our success to our place in California, and to being a member of the Claremont Colleges.

This series has discovered that, without CMC’s founding, the Group Plan would likely have died—and Pomona College would have been the lone liberal arts alternative on the West Coast.

Sixty years ago, President Benson challenged CMC's first students to help realize the school's mission.

Instead, bright students west of the Mississippi River now have a clear choice.

“It’s a place not of armchair exercises,” Gann said at the Claremont Presidents panel, “but a place of high impact, and of people who really want to go out and have a very direct effect on the world.”

In this regard, the College’s leadership understands that Claremont McKenna won’t become better known by changing its values. On the contrary: the only reason we are known at all is because we’ve been faithful to our mission from the start.

Sixty years before Gann, CMC’s first president submitted a note to the Analyst, thanking some of the College’s inaugural students for giving Claremont a chance.

“There are many disadvantages in attending a new college,” Benson wrote. “Procedural points are not clear; temporary class rooms are too hot or too cold; dust is everywhere.”

“But in the long run,” he continued, “the advantages of going to a new college perhaps outweigh the disadvantages. You can watch a beautiful campus develop, watch the administrative difficulties disappear, and take your part in shaping the traditions which will make Claremont Men’s College the outstanding college of the West.”

In many ways, CMCers today still carry that burden. A young college punching above its weight, Claremont McKenna has no more valuable capital than the people who believe in its mission, invest in it, and carry it through. And when faithful, students at this school stand as living proof that its founding mission has succeeded. High impact, indeed.

  • Paul

    Your article has a lot of great historical points.
    Of course, I’m sure a lot of people have concerns about CMC becoming a trade school.
    Unless we have a big demographic shift, this is certainly possible.

    However, I think our diverse student body is really present on campus.
    Its great to see a school like ours becoming more nationally recognized.
    Thank you to our great professors for that!

    Also, is there a place we can read more about the master plan?

    Going forward, it would be exciting to see CMC 30-40 years from now.
    If there are going to be more students, I wonder if CMS will remain a DIII program,
    Rather than make a move up to DII sports with scholarships.
    Let’s stay DIII in my opinion.

  • Connor Barclay

    The last paragraph is beautifully written.

    “A young college punching above its weight, Claremont McKenna has no more valuable capital than the people who believe in its mission, invest in it, and carry it through. And when faithful, students at this school stand as living proof that its founding mission has succeeded. High impact, indeed.”

    I couldn’t agree more.

    Also you point that “Claremont McKenna won’t become better known by changing its values. On the contrary: the only reason we are known at all is because we’ve been faithful to our mission from the start.” is spot on.

    “Crescit cum commercio civitas” ’til I die.

  • Hahaha

    Good censorship, guys. GG.

  • Awesome

    My favorite part is the scanned-in photos and documents — CMC of the past seems so similar…

  • Test

    Test Comment

    • Hahaha

      Heh, what are you testing? Seeing if the grand editor-in-chief is up to his censoring ways? Him and/or his pet master Gann?

  • Hahaha

    “In many ways, CMCers today still carry that burden. A young college punching above its weight…”

    Punching above weight indeed, eh? The forum should stop promoting articles by people who violently assault women.

  • Anonymous

    Michael needs to step down until the charges pending against him are resolved. If he had any class, he would resign and get help. But it is not very classy to hit girls, so I won’t

  • Anonymous

    Michael needs to step down until the charges pending against him are resolved. If he had any class, he would resign and get help. But it is not very classy to hit girls, so I won’t

  • Alum Reader

    Good series, good article. Thanks for the past year of service to the Forum. I hope whoever takes over the publication in a few days can keep increasing the quality of the publication.

    • Hahaha

      Fake. Alum, hope you’ve been keeping up on current news around here…

      • Asdf

        Don’t be silly. Judgments of Wilner’s character shouldn’t obscure the fact that this has been a very impressive project. Regardless of what you think of him as a person, his work is often pretty good.

        • Hahaha

          Well, it’s good to know that you’re okay with the forum supporting writers who assault women work for it.

        • Hang on

          What you just did there is called an ad hominem attack. What Michael has done in his personal life has no bearing on his ability as a writer. On the other hand, if having a messed up personal life makes you a bad writer, then we should probably get rid of Ernest Hemingway, Tennessee Williams, Eugene O’Neill, Hunter Thompson, Jack Kerouac, Charles Bukowski…

        • Guest

          I’d reply if I weren’t banned from replying.

        • Anonymous

          So can we talk about how Wilner criminally assaulted a girl yet or is the Forum no longer the Forum we thought it was?

        • young man



          It would be nice to talk about Wilner’s doings in a public forum more neutral than CJ’s.

          Or should we just continue to whisper in the background?

        • Get a Life

          Maybe you should get a life and talk about things of substance instead of making someone’s life more difficult than it already is. If people want a gossip rag, read Charles Johnson’s stuff or People magazine.

        • mike

          well let’s get some balanced coverage of it then, maybe from our CMC Newspaper? instead he was allowed to moderate the Presidents’ discussion the day after it and they published this the day after people found out about his alleged crime. its not gossip. its actual NEWS and there’s been none of that on the Forum lately

        • Dave

          Why in the world is an incident between two people at a party “news” that the Forum should cover? There’s incidents like this every single weekend, and the Forum covers exactly 0 of them. The right place to discuss what happened is at Michael Wilner’s J-board hearing, and it seems like there really isn’t much value in people repeating the same gossip online.

        • With greater power…

          i’d agree if he weren’t a public figure at CMC.

        • What in the world is a “public figure” at CMC? I went to a few Senate meetings freshman year…does that make me a public figure too? Is my personal life Forum-worthy news?

        • An alum

          Did you punch a chick in the face because you could? And then go on a school paid-for trip? No? Didn’t think so.

        • ASCMC Accountability

          As an appointed, and PAID, member of the ASSOCIATED STUDENTS of CMC, Wilner works for (and represents) each member of the student body, and is consequently accountable to us. Public officials can be recalled/impeached for behavior unbecoming of their title, even if not directly related to their work. They are held to this higher standard because ALL of their behavior reflects upon those who elected/appointed them. I was ashamed to see Wilner represent me as Editor of the Forum at the Presidents Panel after learning about his egregious behavior. We do not have the right to attack or injure Wilner personally, legally or academically, but we do have the right to suspend or terminate his employment on our behalf.

          Unfortunately, Wilner’s term ended before such action could be taken. However, I would urge ASCMC to represent its constituency in issuing a statement of condemnation regarding the behavior of one of its past members, in order to set the public record straight. As a matter of public record, such a statement could be viewed my future employers, as Wilner should not be able to claim “good standing” concerning his departure from the Forum.

          Further, in order to keep our reps accountable to us, we need to be kept up to date on their pertinent activities (which include criminal allegations). This, believe it or not, is a job for the campus news outlet, i.e. the Forum.

        • An alum

          It is news because of how entitled Wilner is, how Gann passed around his name to top employers when some alums can’t get jobs and let him go on school trips. It’s news because not every drunken assault leads to a girl pressing criminal charges. He didn’t even know this chick and fucked up her face because she was standing in the spot he wanted on the dance floor. He’s gross and the way the school handles it is gross. Props to CJ for writing about it. CJ may be an asshole 9 out of 10 times — okay, maybe 99 out of a 100 times — but Wilner is an asshole 100% of the time.

      • Josh

        Agree with Alum Reader — good job with the Forum this year, Carl, Michael, and staff.

        It’s not an easy job to keep up and improve the quality and frequency of articles as well as introduce new ideas like this history of CMC series and the 5C Presidents panel… all while putting up with comments from the anonymous peanut gallery

  • Guest

    So you are going to allow comments that compliment you on your beautiful writing, but not ones that condemn your hitting women, huh?

  • “This series has discovered that, without CMC’s founding, the Group Plan would likely have died—and Pomona College would have been the lone liberal arts alternative on the West Coast.”

    As if Scripps didn’t exist before CMC…?